skip to main |
skip to sidebar
I think that an example of denconstruccion are when now people say shit to what ever thing that is bad, now people say that something are shit to say that this thing are bad or this thing are ugly, but the true meanig of this word are that shit are poop or the sinonim or shit are poop but people take this word and make a deconstruccion and use the word shit like some bad or ugly.
I think nothing is posible because the matter dont occuped all the space and I think that the spaces in the spaces that are not acupped with matter are nothing, from me that are the nothing that are possible and the nothing that exists.
I think that the "typical" art that I like most are music becouse I love to listen music avery time, and I dont like much the other arts
that people always say that are arts, but for me some sports are an arts and the sport that I like most of the sports that I considered arts are the football/soccer, and I think that this sport is an art because when I play soccer or I see other people play soccer I feeling a lot of things and for me soccer express much things in a lot of forms special when you play soccer you can feel and ezpress some things that you cant in other situations.!!!
I think that I have a dificult point of view of this topic becouse I dont think that sanity gives power or you can have power if you are sanity but I also didnt think that if you are insanity you have power becouse I think that if you are sanity or insanity you have chances to have power, I think that if you are sanity you have more chances to have power because you can have more control of the things and can establish better the things that you have to do to have power but I think that to keep the power you have to be some insane becouse you have to do some cracy things or in some cases be bad whith other person and for this you have to be some insane.
Mmm is dificut to me say what is better or in what side I am with a concrete idea or very goods arguments becouse the two sides have good and bad things but I only can say that I "like" more capitalism than the socialism or the thing that I can say is that I like more live in a country that have capitalism than in a country taht have socialim but not becouse I like and I am a follower of the capitalism but I like it more than the socialism becouse I think that persons have to work to get wht they want to get and fight to get hteir pruposses but in the socialism all people have the same thing, money, etc if they work or if they dont work and I think that each person have to have the things, money, etc depens of the esfuerzo that each person do.
Meaning are some arguments that explain a thing and give you some essential ideas to help you to know what is the thing that you want to know what is it.I think that the dign and sich of a meaning is something special that all the things have, all things have some thing special that this thing diferent than the others, the dign and sich of a meaning is that thing that makes the meaning a meaning and I think that this thing(the dign and sich) are that meaning is a meaning and you know that is a meaning becouse the meanings is the only one thing that explain you a thing for example when you want to know what is an apple, apple is a fruit that have a circle form, have skin, and are red, green or yellow, the thing that explain you what is an apple is a meaning and I think that this make a meaning a meaning(the dign and sich).
I think that all persons have neurosis but some persons have more than other and I think that I am one the persons that have much neurosis becouse when people makes me a joke I am calm and I only some times I am angree and in same cases that people made things that is suposed that makes me angree I am calm but I have a lot of neurosis becouse the things that makes me angree almost everything are things that to other persons can be "stupid" and the neurosis that I had more, not the neurosis that makes me more angree but the neurosis that I had more are: when I lost a little thing like the ipod or the remote control, when the computer is slow, when a pencil explote in my pocket, when my new shoes made dirty, when my one shoe have diferent form than the other, when the ugly girls like you but the cute girls dont like you, But my 2 neurosis that I had more and makes me more angree are when my mother calls me passing 2 seconds and she dont say me nothing, and the other and the "bad" neurosis is when my ipod turns off and I am not prepared.
In this post about are human beings matter or psyhce, and why, I think that I dont have a lot of things to say but I can say that I think that human being are matter because you have the chance to think that human is psyche or isnt but also I think but you not have chance to think than human being isnt matter becouse I think that is obviousli that human is matter because a reason: human baing is matter because matter is anything that occupies a place in the space, and all the humans that exists occupied an place in the space, and because of this I say that human beign are matter.
Aristotle was a Greek philosopher, a student of Plato and teacher of Alexander. His writings cover many subjects, including physics, methafisics,poetry, theater, music, logic, rhetoric, politics, government, ethics, biology, and zoology. Together with Plato and Socrates that are the teacher of plato, Aristotle is one of the most important founding figures in Western philosophy. Aristotle's writings constitute a first at creating a comprehensive system of Western philosophy, encompassing morality and aesthetics, logic and science, politics and metaphysics.
Aristotle's views on the physical science profoundly shaped medieval scholarship, and their influence extended well into the Renaisance, although they were ultimately replaced by Newtonian physics. In the biological sciences, some of his observations were confirmed to be accurate only in the nineteenth century. His works contain the earliest known formal study of logic, which was incorporated in the late nineteenth century into modern formal logic. In metaphysics, aritotelianism had a profound influence on phylosophical and thological thinking in the islamic and jewish tradition in the middle ages, and it continues to influence christian theology, especially eastern orthodox theology, and the schoalastic tradition of the catholic church. His ethics, though always influential, gained renewed interest with the modern advent of virtue etics. All aspects of Aristotle's philosophy continue to be the object of active academic study today. Though Aristotle wrote many elegant treatises and dialogues, it is thought that the majority of his writings are now lost and only about one third of the original works have survived.
Ancient philosophical theories of soul are in many respects sensitive to ways of speaking and thinking about the soulthat are not specificaly philosophical or teoretical. We therefore begin with what the word ‘soul’ meant to speakers of Classical Greek, and what it would have been natural to think about and associate with the soul. We then turn to various Presocratic thinkers, and to the philosophical theories that are our primary concern, those of Plato, Aristotle. These are by far the most carefully worked out theories of soul in ancient philosophy. Later theoretical developments for instance, in the writings of Plotinus and other Platonists, as well as the Church Fathers are best studied against the background of the classical theories, from which, in large part, they derive.
From comparatively humble Homeric beginnings, the word ‘soul’ undergoes quite remarkable semantic expansion in sixth and fifth century usage. By the end of the fifth century the time of Socrates' death soul is standardly thought and spoken of, for instance, as the distinguishing mark of living things, as something that is the subject of emotional states and that is responsible for planning and practical thinking, and also as the bearer of such virtues as courage and justice. Coming to philosophical theory, we first trace a development towards comprehensive articulation of a very broad conception of soul, according to which the soul is not only responsible for mental or psychological functions like thought, perception and desire, and is the bearer of moral qualities, but in some way or other accounts for all the vital functions that any living organism performs. This broad conception, which is clearly in close contact with ordinary Greek usage by that time, finds its fullest articulation in Aristotle's theory. The theories of the Hellenistic period, by contrast, are interested more narrowly in the soul as something that is responsible specifically for mental or psychological functions. They either de emphasize or sever the ordinary language connection between soul and life in all its functions and aspects.
I think nothing is posible because the matter dont occuped all the space and I think that the spaces in the spaces that are not acupped with matter are nothing, from me that are the nothing that are possible and the nothing that exists.
Mmm is dificut to me say what is better or in what side I am with a concrete idea or very goods arguments becouse the two sides have good and bad things but I only can say that I "like" more capitalism than the socialism or the thing that I can say is that I like more live in a country that have capitalism than in a country taht have socialim but not becouse I like and I am a follower of the capitalism but I like it more than the socialism becouse I think that persons have to work to get wht they want to get and fight to get hteir pruposses but in the socialism all people have the same thing, money, etc if they work or if they dont work and I think that each person have to have the things, money, etc depens of the esfuerzo that each person do.
I think that all persons have neurosis but some persons have more than other and I think that I am one the persons that have much neurosis becouse when people makes me a joke I am calm and I only some times I am angree and in same cases that people made things that is suposed that makes me angree I am calm but I have a lot of neurosis becouse the things that makes me angree almost everything are things that to other persons can be "stupid" and the neurosis that I had more, not the neurosis that makes me more angree but the neurosis that I had more are: when I lost a little thing like the ipod or the remote control, when the computer is slow, when a pencil explote in my pocket, when my new shoes made dirty, when my one shoe have diferent form than the other, when the ugly girls like you but the cute girls dont like you, But my 2 neurosis that I had more and makes me more angree are when my mother calls me passing 2 seconds and she dont say me nothing, and the other and the "bad" neurosis is when my ipod turns off and I am not prepared.
